Empirical evaluation of a process to increase consensus in group architectural decision making
نویسندگان
چکیده
Context: Many software architectural decisions are group decisions rather than decisions made by individuals. Consensus in a group of decision makers increases the acceptance of a decision among decision makers and their confidence in that decision. Furthermore, going through the process of reaching consensus means that decision makers understand better the decision (including the decision topic, decision options, rationales, and potential outcomes). Little guidance exists on how to increase consensus in group architectural
منابع مشابه
CCollaborative Framework for Decision Making Process of the Water Management (Case Study: Kashafrood Basin)
Sophisticated social- ecology systems, such as those in water management in a basin, are usually dynamic, multidimensional, or multidimensional, requiring serious engagement by multiple actors, and decision making in such systems is always faced with serious problems Kashafrood basin in Khorasan Razavi province is one of the most critical aquifers in the country due to the high population growt...
متن کاملHybrid multi-criteria group decision-making for supplier selection problem with interval-valued Intuitionistic fuzzy data
The main objectives of supply chain management are reducing the risk of supply chain and production cost, increase the income, improve the customer services, optimizing the achievement level, and business processes which would increase ability, competency, customer satisfaction, and profitability. Further, the process of selecting the appropriate supplier capable of providing buyerchr('39')s re...
متن کاملAssessment of distance-based multi-attribute group decision-making methods from a maintenance strategy perspective
Maintenance has been acknowledged by industrial management as a significant influencing factor of plant performance. Effective plant maintenance can be realized by developing a proper maintenance strategy. However, selecting an appropriate maintenance strategy is difficult because maintenance is a non-repetitive task such as production activity. Maintenance also does not leave a consistent trac...
متن کاملA novel three-stage distance-based consensus ranking method
In this study, we propose a three-stage weighted sum method for identifying the group ranks of alternatives. In the first stage, a rank matrix, similar to the cross-efficiency matrix, is obtained by computing the individual rank position of each alternative based on importance weights. In the second stage, a secondary goal is defined to limit the vector of weights since the vector of weights ob...
متن کاملAdministrative Process and Criteria Ranking for Drug Entering Health Insurance List in Iran-TOPSIS-Based Consensus Model
The purposes of our study were to identify a drug entry process, collect, and prioritize criteria for selecting drugs for the list of basic health insurance commitments to prepare an “evidence based reimbursement eligibility plan” in Iran.The 128 noticeable criteria were found when studying the health insurance systems of developed countries. Four parts (involving criteria) formed the first que...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Information & Software Technology
دوره 72 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016